brandXpress Blog

brandXpress Blog

Recent Posts

  • The Art of Reinvention: Examining 5 Remarkable Rebranding Success Stories
  • Unveiling the Future: Emerging Trends in Branding
  • Is Brand Loyalty Really Dead?
  • Using branding the right way
  • Corporate Events – Still an Important Element of the Marketing Mix [Guest Post]

Recent Comments

  1. toner wajah on The Functions of a Brand
  2. izzi on 5 Dimensions of Brand Identity
  3. corporate branding singapore on 10 Steps For Successful Corporate Branding
  4. Sofyana Bellaa on Animal Planet Logo Change
  5. Erick on 6 Components of Branding

Archives

  • November 2023
  • September 2017
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • May 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005

Categories

  • Brand Elements
  • Brand Extension
  • Brand Management
  • Brand Value
  • Branding
  • Co-Branding
  • Corporate Branding
  • Country Branding
  • Famous Brands
  • Internal Branding
  • Logo
  • Naming
  • News
  • Personal Branding
  • Positioning
  • Re-Branding
  • Resources
  • Slogan
  • Small Business
  • Strategy
  • Top Brands
Skip to content

brandXpress Blog

AT&T New Logo

The recent unveiling of the at&t (sort of) new logo created quite a buzz online and not only. And it doesn’t look to be a very good one as the opininons are spreading from whatever to it sucks. I have to admit I tend to agree with the last. I don’t like it.

It’s just a basic example of what I talked about in my previous post: re-branding with no particular reason. Challanging customers, just to see if they can follow your periodic rebranding efforts.

Short history: last year Cingular snapped up AT&T Wireless, which had been spun off from AT&T in 2001. They then spent the better part of the past year spending tons of time and money trying to eliminate the AT&T Wireless brand and integrate its network, subscribers, and services into Cingular. The integration is pretty much done, but now they’re going to go through all that again, except in reverse, which means that some of you out there will go from being AT&T Wireless subcribers, to Cingular subscribers, only to become AT&T Wireless subscribers all over again.

I bet they needed a pricy branding agency advicing them into this strategy (rumors say Interbrand).

Well as this wasn’t enough, while the AT&T old name was (and I agree) a valuable one, the old logo wasn’t “trendy” anymore. So the agency put up a memo convincing the AT&T guys that the old logo needs a re-work, “aimed at freshening up the brand”. The globe is getting a third transparent dimension. Capitals are turned to lowercases, having it’s more trendy and modern as an argument:

Lowercase type is now used for the “AT&T” characters because it projects a more welcoming and accessible image.

Well I tend to agree more with Russel on this one:

Lowercase is a horrible choice, though I’m sure some branding company out there sold the choice as adding a “new, youthful” appearance or something (a perfect choice for the name’s 110 year history). Secondly, the fact it’s not bold makes the letters themselves less of a logomark, so now you *need* to have the globe-thing next to the letters or you lose the whole branding.

Further readings:
at&t brand center
Evolutionary chart of logo (PDF)
New logo formats

Tag: logo, rebranding, re-branding

Related

Posted on November 22, 2005 by Daniel in Famous Brands, Logo

Post navigation

Previous postRe-branding – Not Always The Answer
Next postBranding News Roundup – 11/29/05
Proudly powered by WordPress ~ Theme: Scrawl by WordPress.com.